05:00
Ajay Koli
Head, School of Data Science
Nalanda Academy - Wardha
koliajaykumar@gmail.com
ajay_kolii
05:00
Please write what comes to your mind when you hear the word research.
“A set of logical, systematic, documented methods for investigating nature and natural processes; the knowledge produced by these investigations.”1
Agreement Reality: Those things we “know” as part and parcel of the culture we share with those around us.
Epistemology: The science of knowing systems of knowledge.
Methodology: The science of finding out; procedures for scientific investigation.
“Research results in the creation of knowledge to solve a problem, answer a question, and better describe or understand something.” 1
“the process of finding solutions to a problem after a thorough study and analysis of the situational factors”1
“is about asking questions, exploring problems and reflecting on what emerges in order to make meaning from the data and tell the research story”1
🧯 Applied research: “to solve a current problem faced by the manager in the work setting, demanding a timely solution”
📚 Basic research: “to generate a body of knowledge by trying to comprehend how certain problems that occur in organizations can be solved.”
05:00
If you have to conduct research what will be your reason(s) and why?
Over-generalization
Selective or inaccurate observation
Illogical reasoning
Resistance to change
Over-generalization: “Occurs when we unjustifiably conclude that what is true for some cases is true for all cases”
Selective or inaccurate observation: “Choosing to look only at things that are in line with our preferences or beliefs.”
Illogical reasoning: “The premature jumping to conclusions or arguing on the basis of invalid assumptions.”
Resistance to change: “The reluctance to change our ideas in light of new information.”
To Describe
To Explore
To Explain
To Evaluate
Research in which social phenomena are defined and described.
Seeks to find out how people get along in the setting under question, what meanings they give to their actions, and what issues concern them.
Seeks to identify causes and effects of social phenomena and to predict how one phenomenon will change or vary in response to variation in another phenomenon.
Research that describes or identifies the impact of social policies and programs.
02:00
👇 What is the goal of this research paper?
02:00
👇 What is the goal of this research paper?
02:00
👇 What is the goal of this research paper?
“Research approaches are plans and the procedures for research that span the steps from broad assumptions to detailed methods of data collection, analysis, and interpretation.”
“It involves the intersection of philosophical assumptions, designs and specific methods.”
“using words”
“for exploring and understanding the meaning individuals or groups ascribe to a social or human problem.”
open-ended questions and responses
flexible report structure
use numbers
“for testing objective theories by examining relationship among variables”
closed-ended questions and responses
set structure
Qualitative methods, mixed methods, quantitative methods. pic.twitter.com/6iv8izV6Ag
— Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega ((raulpacheco?)) November 11, 2021
10:00
Which research approach will you use to study the consumer satisfaction level for each product in India? And why?
is the 🕸️ interconnection of:
Philosophical World-views,
Research Designs, &
Research Methods
“A general philosophical orientation about the world and the nature of research that a researcher brings to a study”
Determination (cause & effect)
Reductionism
(concept \(\rightarrow\) variables \(\rightarrow\) hypothesis)
Empirical observation and measurement
Theory verification
Understanding
Multiple participant meanings
Social & historical construction
Theory generation
During the 1980s & 1990s for marginalized individuals in society
Issues of power and social justice, discrimination, and oppression.
Includes critical theorists; Marxists; feminists; racial and ethnic minorities; person with disabilities; indigenous and post colonial peoples; and members of LGBTQ.
Research contain action and change-oriented
It arises out of actions, situations, and consequence of actions
Problem-centred instead of methods
Pluralistic
Real-world practice oriented
“These are types of inquiry within qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches that provide specific direction for procedures in a research study”
Visible during the 1990s and in the 21st century.
Narrative research from the humanities … one or more individuals to provide stories about their lives.
Phenomenology from philosophy and psychology … description culminates in the essence of the experiences for several individuals who have all experienced the phenomenon.
Grounded theory from sociology in which the researcher derives a general, abstract theory of a process, action, or interaction grounded in the view of participants.
Ethnography from anthropology and sociology in which the research studies the shared patterns of behaviors, languages, and actions of an intact cultural group in a natural setting.
Case study researcher develops an in-depth analysis of a case … collect detailed information using a variety of data collection procedures
During the late 19th century and throughout the 20th century.
Experimental Designs seeks to determine if a specific treatment influences an outcome.
Survey research provides a quantitative or numeric description of trends, attitudes, or opinions of a population by studying a sample of that population.
Began in late 1980s
Convergent mixed methods collects both forms of data at the same time and integrates the information in the results.
Explanatory sequential quantitative studies followed by the qualitative study, the qualitative study was conducted to explain further/better the results of quantitative study.
Exploratory sequential qualitative study was done first then this study’s results are used to do the quantitative study.
Transformative, embedded, or multi-phase
“Involve the forms of data collection, analysis, and interpretation that researchers propose for their studies”
Emerging methods
Open-ended questions
Interview data, observation data, document data & audio-visual data
Text & image analysis
Themes, patterns, and interpretation
Pre-determined methods
Instrument based questions
Performance data, attitude data, observational data, & census data
Statistical analysis
Statistical interpretation
Both predetermined & emerging methods
Both open- and closed- ended questions
Multiple forms of data drawing on all possibilities
Statistical & text analysis
Across databases interpretation
Constructivist worldview
Ethnographic design
Observation of behavior
Post-positivist worldview
Experimental design
Measures of attitudes
Pragmatic world-view
Collection of both qualitative & quantitative data
05:00
Take a topic that you would like to study, and using the combinations of worldviews, designs, and research methods, discuss a project that brings together a worldview, designs, and methods. Identify whether this would be quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods research.
the organization,
the members that sponsor the research,
the researchers who undertake the research, and
the respondents who provide them with the necessary data.
Prior to conducting the study
Beginning of the study
Collecting data
Analyzing data
Reporting, sharing, and storing data
Examine professional association standards.
Seek college/university approval on campus through the board.
Gain local permission from site and participants.
Select a site without a vested interest in outcome of study.
Negotiate authorship for publication.
Consult the code of ethics for professional association in your area.
Submit proposal for board approval.
Identify and go through local approvals; find gatekeepers or key personnel to help.
Select sites that will not raise power issues with researchers.
Give credit for work done on the project; decide on author order in future publication.
Identify a research problem that will benefit participants.
Disclose purpose of the study.
Do not pressure participants into signing consent forms.
Respect norms and charters of indigenous societies.
Be sensitive to needs of vulnerable populations (eg., children).
Conduct a needs assessment or informal conversation with participants about their needs.
Contact participants, and inform them of the general purpose of the study.
Tell participants that they do not have to sign form.
Find out about cultural, religious, gender, and other differences that need to be respected.
Obtain appropriate consent (eg., parents, as well as children).
Respect the site, and disrupt as little as possible.
Make certain that all participants receive the same treatment.
Avoid deceiving participants.
Respect potential power imbalances and exploitation of participants (eg., interviewing, observing).
Do not “use” participants by gathering data and leaving site.
Avoid collecting harmful information.
Build trust, and convey extent of anticipated disruption in gaining access.
Put into place wait list provisions for treatment for controls.
Discuss purpose of the study and how data will be used.
Avoid leading questions. Withhold sharing personal impressions. Avoid disclosing sensitive information. Involve participants as collaborators.
Provide rewards for participating.
Stick to questions stated in an interview protocol.
Avoid siding with participants (going native).
Avoid disclosing only positive results.
Respect the privacy and anonymity of participants.
Report multiple perspectives.
Report contrary findings.
Assign fictious names or aliases; develop composite profiles of participants.
Avoid falsifying authorship, evidence, data, findings, and conclusions.
Do not plagiarize.
Avoid disclosing information that would harm participants.
Communicate in clear, straightforward, appropriate language.
Share data with others
Keep raw data and other materials (eg., details of procedures, instruments.)
Do not duplicate or piecemeal publications.
Provide complete proof of compliance with ethical issues and lack of conflict of interest, if requested.
State who owns the data from a study.
Report honestly.
See APA guidelines for permissions needed to reprint or adapt work of others.
Use composite stories so that individuals cannot be identified.
Use unbiased language appropriate for audiences of the research.
Provide copies of report to participants and stakeholders. Share results with other researchers. Consider website distribution. Consider publishing in different languages.
Store data and materials for 5 years (as per APA).
Refrain from using the same material for more than one publication.
Disclose funders for research. Disclose who will profit from the research.
Give credit for ownership to researcher, participants, and advisers.
“to practice writing rather than simply talk about it”
Early in the process of research, write ideas down rather than talk about them.
Working through several drafts of a proposal rather than trying to polish the first draft
Do this exercise once a day for a week.
At the end of the week, you’ll have written thousands of words.
Out of these thousands of words, you’ll have a few hundred (or even more) useful words.
Write them separately. Or, you can cut and paste them in a new document.— Mushtaq Bilal, PhD ((MushtaqBilalPhD?)) November 11, 2022
Do not edit your proposal at the early-draft stage.
Establish the discipline of writing in a regular and continuous way on your proposal.
Make writing a daily activity, regardless of mood, regardless of readiness to write.
Write while you are fresh.
Avoid writing in binges (excessive).
Write in small, regular amounts
Schedule writing tasks
Time spent writing + page finished + tasks completed
Share your writing with supportive peers.
Use consistent terms in your proposal.
Readers need road signs to guide them from one major idea to the next.
Coherence in writing means that the ideas tie together and logically flow from one sentence to another and from one paragraph to another.
Use the active voice as much as possible in scholarly writing.
Use strong active verbs.
Pay close attention to the tense of past studies:
Edit and revise drafts to trim the fat.
“If I have seen further,
it is by standing on the
shoulders of giants.”
- Newton (1675)
“Citing sources allows scholars to give credit to other scholars for their hard work and their ideas.”
“By citing sources, scholars provide a roadmap for readers who are interested in learning more about a topic and joining the ongoing conversation about that topic.”
“Purposely misrepresenting the work of other authors – that is, their viewpoints, ideas, models, findings, conclusions, interpretations, and so on.”
“Plagiarism – the use of another’s original words, arguments, or ideas as though they were your own, even if this is done in good faith, out of carelessness, or out of ignorance.”
Keep track of your sources; print electronic sources
Keep sources in correct context
Don’t cut and paste: File and label your sources
Keep your own writing and your sources separate
Keep your notes and your draft separate
Paraphrase carefully in your notes; acknowledge your sources explicitly when paraphrasing
Don’t save your citations for later
Always use quotation marks for directly quoted material, even for short phrases and key terms.
15:00
OR
OR
Most organized research begins with a description of what is planned in the project: what questions it will raise and how it will answer them.
Often such proposals are created for the purpose of getting the resources needed to conduct the research envisioned.
Before any research study is undertaken, there should be an agreement between the person who authorizes the study and the researcher as to:
the problem to be investigated,
the methodology to be used,
the duration of the study, and
its cost.
What do readers need to better understand your topic?
What do readers need to know about your topic?
What do you propose to study?
What is the setting, and who are the people you will study?
What methods do you plan to use to collect data?
How will you analyze the data?
How will you validate your findings?
What ethical issues will your study present?
What do preliminary results show about the practicability and value of the proposed study?
Introduction
Statement of the problem (issue, existing literature about problem, deficiencies in literature, relevance of study for audiences)
Purpose of the study
Research questions or hypotheses
Theoretical perspective
Review of the literature (theory may be included in this section instead of the introduction)
Methods
Type of research design (e.g., experimental, survey)
Population, sample, and participants
Data collection instruments, variables, and materials
Data analysis procedures
Anticipated ethical issues in the study
Preliminary studies or pilot tests
Appendixes: Instruments, timeline, and proposed budget
Purposiveness
Rigour
Testability
Replicability
Precision and confidence
Objectivity
Generalizability
Parsimony
Purposiveness: a definite aim or purpose or goal.
Rigour: a good theoretical base and a sound methodological design.
Testability: hypotheses should be testable.
Replicability: similar findings emerge on the basis of data collected by others employing the same methods.
To design the research in a manner that ensures that our findings are as close to reality as possible.
Conclusions should be based upon the facts of the findings derived from actual data,and not on our own subjective or emotional values.
The more objective the interpretation of the data, the more scientific the research investigation becomes.
Refers to the scope (wider range) of applicability of the research findings in one organizational setting to other settings.
Not many research findings can be generalized to all other settings.
A more elaborate sampling design, which would doubtless increase the generalizability of the results.
Simplicity in explaining the phenomena or problems that occur.
A good understanding of the problem and the important factors that influence it.
What to cook?
How to cook?
What is the result of your cooking?
How similar or different is your cooked dish?
So what, you cooked this dish (sh!t)?
What to cook?
How to cook?
What is the result of your cooking?
How similar or different is your cooked dish?
So what, you cooked this dish (sh!t)?
Establishing the problem leading to the study,
Reviewing the literature about the problem,
Identifying deficiencies in the literature about the problem,
Targeting an audience and noting the significance of the problem for this audience, and
Identifying the purpose of the proposed study.
Identification of the Broad Problem
\(\downarrow\)
Preliminary Research
\(\downarrow\)
Definition of the Research Problem
“The topic is the subject or subject matter of a proposed study”
“casteism”, “organizational creativity”, “psychological stress”, “consumer buying behavior”, “exam anxiety”, “leadership”, “service quality”
“The topic becomes the central idea to learn about or to explore”
“Topic grounds us and provides a sign of what we are studying.”
Feasibility given the time and resources available
Social importance, and
Scientific relevance
“Adds to the pool of research knowledge in the literature available on the topic, …
Replicate past studies, …
Lifts up the voices of under-represented groups or individuals, …
Helps to address social justice, or …
Transforms the ideas and beliefs of the researcher.”
Studying an unusual location (e.g., rural India).
Examining an unusual group of participants (e.g., refugees).
Taking a perspective that may not be expected and reverses the expectation (e.g., why marriages do work rather than do not work).
Providing novel means of collecting data (e.g., collect sounds).
Presenting results in unusual ways.
Studying a timely topic (e.g., immigration issues)
Reviewing studies that have examined the issue.
Summarize large groups of studies instead of individual ones.
Justify the importance of the study
To create distinction between past studies and the proposed one.
Topics have not been explored with a particular group, sample, or population;
The literature may need to be replicated or repeated;
The voices of underrepresented groups left
“Future research” to look for gaps.
3 or 4 reasons that the study adds to scholarly research and literature in the field.
3 or 4 reasons about how the study helps improve practice.
3 or 4 reasons as to why the study will improve policy or decision making.
“Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else has thought.”
– Albert Szent-Gyorgyi
“literature review helps to determine whether the topic is worth studying, and it provides insight into ways in which the researcher can limit the scope to a needed area of inquiry.”
“to consider whether the research topic can and should be researched”
It shares with the reader the results of other studies that are closely related to the one being undertaken.
It relates a study to the larger, ongoing dialogue in the literature, filling in gaps and extending prior studies
It provides a framework for establishing the importance of the study as well as a benchmark for comparing the results with other findings.
Textbooks
Journals
Theses
Conference proceedings
Unpublished manuscripts
Reports
Newspapers
The Internet
Search for that one reason/sentence while writing. #AcademicTwitter (OpenAcademics?) (PhDVoice?) (PhD_Genie?) pic.twitter.com/DzaYRY8Acr
— Dr. Imran Farooq ((drimran_farooq?)) December 19, 2021
Begin by identifying key words.
Searching the databases like Google Scholar, Web of Science, EBSCO, ProQuest, and JSTOR or you can also use website like Library Genesis to download books and papers.
Locate about 50 reports of research in articles or books related to research on your topic.
Skim this initial group of articles or chapters, and collect those that are central to your topic.
Designing a literature map … a visual picture of groupings of the literature on the topic that illustrates how your particular study will add to the existing literature and position your study within the larger body of research.
Begin to draft summaries of the most relevant articles. Include precise references to the literature using an appropriate style guide like APA.
assemble the literature review, structuring it thematically or organizing it by important concepts.
This summary should also point toward the methods …
It is at this point as well that you could advance a critique of the past literature and point our deficiencies in it and issues in its methods.
Academic writing is wild bc you’ll read four articles just to write one sentence.
Anyway, here’s a thread of resources I’ve been using to speed through this review I’m working on:— Anicca Harriot🔬 ((13adh13?)) June 20, 2021
“A visual tool to help researchers and practitioners find and explore academic papers.”1
“Connected Papers uses a single, user-chosen ‘origin paper’ to build a map of related research, based partly on overlapping citations. The service recently surpassed one million users”2
Website: https://www.connectedpapers.com/
“We are a charitable non-profit organization and we believe that a better way to explore and discover scientific knowledge will benefit us all.”
“Our Goal is to revolutionize discovery of scientific knowledge. We are building a visual interface that dramatically increases the visibility of research findings for science and society alike.”
Website: https://openknowledgemaps.org/index
“The AI-powered article summarizer”
“reads your research articles, reports and book chapters in seconds and breaks them down into bite-sized sections”
Website: https://www.scholarcy.com/
“Reading is hard. Listening is easy. Listen to the things you normally read with the #1 text-to-speech AI reader.”
Website: https://speechify.com/
“1.1b citation statements extracted and analyzed from over 32m full-text articles”
“helps you see whether publications, research results, and claims have been supported, contrasted, or mentioned by other researchers.”
Website: https://www.scite.ai/
“explains a certain phenomenon, …
and the idea is that this explanation will hold in a wide range of settings.”1
“theory is any concept, instrument, model, or framework that helps them to think about or solve a problem, to describe a phenomenon, or to better understand a topic of interest”
By Victor Vroom (in 1964):
“people will choose how to behave depending on the outcome they expect as a result of their behavior.”
“people decide what to do based on what they expect the outcome to be”
“individuals are motivated to perform if they know that their extra performance is recognized and rewarded”
by Ivan Pavlov
Some research is aimed at building theory …
other to test a theory …
to describe what is going on, using an existing framework, instrument, or model.
Researchers often test hypotheses stemming from theories.
Broader theory guiding to the study hypotheses.
It may generate a theory as the final outcome of a study and place it at the end of a project
Sometimes it comes at the beginning and provides a lens that shapes what is looked at and the questions asked
Researchers may both test theories and generate them
Contain a theoretical framework within which both quantitative and qualitative data are collected
Causality: means we would expect variable \(X\) to cause variable \(Y\).
Does drinking one glass of red wine daily (\(X\)) cause you have a reduced risk for a heart attack (\(Y\))?
Do number of playing hours (\(a\)) and attendance (\(b\)) influence the marks in the exam (\(z\))?
\[Red\;Wine \longrightarrow Heart\;attack\] \[X \longrightarrow Y\]
Variable: “refers to a characteristic or attribute of an individual or an organization that can be measured or observed and that varies among the people or organization being studied.”
Gender, age, socio-economic status; attitudes or behaviors such as racism, social control, political power, leadership etc..
Independent variables:
Those that influence, or affect outcomes in experimental studies.
They are manipulated in an experiment and thus independent of all other influences.
Dependent variables:
Those that depend on the independent variables,
They are the outcomes or results of the influence of the independent variables
Independent variable/Predictor variable
Dependent variable / Outcome variable
Confounding variable
Mediating variable
Moderating variable
“a tentative, yet testable, statement, which predicts what you expect to find in your empirical data.”
“logically conjectured relationships between two or more variables expressed in the form of testable statements”
Young women will more likely to express dissatisfaction with their body weight, when they are more frequently exposed to images of thin models in advertisements.
If young women are more frequently exposed to images of thin models in advertisements, then they will be more likely to express dissatisfaction with their body weight.
“the direction of the relationship between the variables (positive/negative) is indicated”
The greater the stress experienced in the job, the lower the job satisfaction of employees.
Women are more motivated than men.
“postulate a relationship or difference, but offer no indication of the direction of these relationships or differences”
There is a relation between arousal-seeking tendency and consumer preferences for complex product designs.
There is a difference between the work ethic values of American and Asian employees.
“A set of interrelated constructs (variables), definitions, and prepositions that presents a systematic view of phenomena by specifying relations among variables, with the purpose of explaining natural phenomena” (adapted from Kerlinger 1979)
“Theory helps to explain (predict) phenomena that occur in the world”
“Theories develop when researchers test a prediction over and over.”
Investigators combine independent, mediating, and dependent variables into questions.
These questions provide information about the type of relationship (positive, negative, or unknown) and its magnitude (high or low).
Forming this information into a predictive statement (hypothesis)
When researcher test hypotheses over and over in different settings and with different populations, a theory emerges, and someone gives it a name.
Theory develops as an explanation to advance knowledge in particular fields.
Micro-level Theories: provide explanations limited to small slices of time, space, or number of people; such as Goffman’s theory of face work.
Meso-level Theories: link micro and macro levels; like theories of organizations, social movement, or communities; such as Collin’s theory of control in organizations.
Macro-level Theories: explain larger aggregates, such as social institutions, cultural systems, and whole societies; such as theory of social stratification.
Quantitative Methods
“both approaches share a common goal of helping the researcher make inferences about relationships among variables, and how the sample results may generalize to a broader population of interest”
“these designs reflect post-positivist philosophical assumptions”
“examining the relationships between and among variables is central”
“provides a quantitative description of trends, attitudes, and opinions of population, or…
tests for associations among variables of a population,…
by studying a sample of that population.”
Identify the purpose of survey research: questions about variables of interest to you.
Specify the form of data collection,
Like mail, telephone, the internet, personal interviews, or group administration
Provide rationale for the procedure, strengths and weaknesses, costs, data availability, and convenience.
Indicate why a survey methods is the preferred type of approach for this study.
Indicate whether the survey will be
Cross-sectional - the data collected at one point in time.
Longitudinal - with the data collected over time.
“refers to the entire group of people, events, or things of interest that the researcher wishes to investigate.”
“An element in a single member of the population”
“a subset of the population. It comprises some members selected from it, some, but not all, elements of the population form the sample”
“by studying the sample, the researcher should be able to draw conclusions that are generalizable to the population of interest.”
“A subject is a single member of the sample, just as an element is a single member of the population”
“The sampling unit is the element or set of elements that is available for selection in some stage of the sampling process.”
“The process of selecting the right individuals, objects, or events as representatives for the entire population”
Define the population.
Determine the sample frame.
Determine the sampling design.
Determine the appropriate sample size.
Execute the sampling process.
Define the population … in terms of elements, geographical boundaries, and time.
Determine the sample frame … a representation of all the elements in the population from which the sample is drawn … it may not be always be a current, up-to-date document
Determine the sampling design.
Indicate the number of people in the sample and the procedures to compute this number.
Sample trade off: larger sample more accuracy in the inferences but more sample more time and cost.
“Any technique in which samples are selected in some way not suggested by probability theory”
Relying on available subjects, such as stopping people at a street corner or some other location
“risky” sampling method for social research
No control over the representativeness of a sample
(Non-Probability Sampling)
(Non-Probability Sampling)
“the units to be observed are selected on the basis of the researcher’s judgement about which ones will be the most useful or representative”
“situation being studied becomes clearer and certain types of subjects seem more central to understanding than others”
(Non-Probability Sampling)
(Non-Probability Sampling)
“each person interviewed may be asked to suggest additional people for interviewing”
“appropriate when the members of a special population are difficult to locate”
“often employed in field research”
(Non-Probability Sampling)
(Non-Probability Sampling)
“When researchers want precise, statistical descriptions of large populations”
“The general term for samples selected in accordance with probability theory, typically involving some random-selection mechanism”
“that quality of a sample of having the same distribution of characteristics as the population from which it was selected”
“By implication, description and explanation derived from an analysis of the sample may be assumed to represent similar ones in the population.”
“Representativeness is enhanced by probability sampling and provides for generalizability and the use of inferential statistics”
Simple Random Sampling (SRS)
Systematic Random Sampling,
Cluster Sampling, and
Stratified Random Sampling
(Probability Sampling Methods)
“A type of probability sampling in which the units composing a population are assigned numbers. A set of random numbers is generated, and the units having those numbers are included in the sample”
(Probability Sampling Methods)
(Probability Sampling Methods)
“A type of probability sampling in which every \(k\)th unit in list is selected in the sample”
(Probability Sampling Methods)
“A multistage sampling in which natural groups (clusters) are sampled initially, with the members of each selected group being subsampled afterward.”
(Probability Sampling Methods)
“A multistage sampling in which natural groups (clusters) are sampled initially, with the members of each selected group being subsampled afterward.”
(Probability Sampling Methods)
Stratification: “The grouping of the units composing a population into homogeneous groups before sampling”
(Probability Sampling Methods)
Stratification: “The grouping of the units composing a population into homogeneous groups before sampling”
Name the survey instruments used to collect data.
Validity of scores using the instrument.
Reliability of scores on the instrument.
Sample items.
Content of instrument.
Pilot testing.
Administering the survey.
“systematically manipulates one or more variables in order to evaluate how this manipulation impacts an outcome (or outcomes) of interest”
🤝 Social Science
“The use of scientific methods to investigate individuals, societies, and social processes; the knowledge produced by these investigations.”1