RESEARCH METHODS

Ajay Koli



Ajay Koli
Head, School of Data Science
Nalanda Academy - Wardha
koliajaykumar@gmail.com
ajay_kolii

Schedule

📅 From 07 Nov to 30 Nov 2022

From 6:00 to 8:00 PM IST

🚥 7~10 minutes of a break during each session

Total 30~35 hours of teaching

Warning

🏃‍♂️ 🏃‍♀️ BE ON TIME (plan for ten minutes early)

During the Sessions

🌠 These slide’s online link is https://research-methods.netlify.app/

Slides created on 15 Oct 2022 (updated on Dec 23 2022)

🧠 Your Turn

🗣️ Interact during the sessions

🙏 Be Kind!

🧠 Your Turn

05:00


Please write what comes to your mind when you hear the word research.

why?

stories

science

🌏 Science

“A set of logical, systematic, documented methods for investigating nature and natural processes; the knowledge produced by these investigations.”1

🤝 Social Science

“The use of scientific methods to investigate individuals, societies, and social processes; the knowledge produced by these investigations.”1

Inquiry1

  • Agreement Reality: Those things we “know” as part and parcel of the culture we share with those around us.

  • Epistemology: The science of knowing systems of knowledge.

  • Methodology: The science of finding out; procedures for scientific investigation.

🤔 Why Research?

“Research results in the creation of knowledge to solve a problem, answer a question, and better describe or understand something.” 1

Define Research

“the process of finding solutions to a problem after a thorough study and analysis of the situational factors”1

Define Research

“is about asking questions, exploring problems and reflecting on what emerges in order to make meaning from the data and tell the research story1

Types of Business Research1

  • 🧯 Applied research: “to solve a current problem faced by the manager in the work setting, demanding a timely solution”

  • 📚 Basic research: “to generate a body of knowledge by trying to comprehend how certain problems that occur in organizations can be solved.”

🧠 Your Turn

05:00


If you have to conduct research what will be your reason(s) and why?

rm help

Research Methods Help to Avoid1:

  • Over-generalization

  • Selective or inaccurate observation

  • Illogical reasoning

  • Resistance to change

Important

  • Generalization will be coming back again and again in future sessions kindly make a note of it.

Research Methods Help to Avoid:

Over-generalization: “Occurs when we unjustifiably conclude that what is true for some cases is true for all cases”

Research Methods Help to Avoid:

Selective or inaccurate observation: “Choosing to look only at things that are in line with our preferences or beliefs.”

Research Methods Help to Avoid:

Illogical reasoning: “The premature jumping to conclusions or arguing on the basis of invalid assumptions.”

Research Methods Help to Avoid:

Resistance to change: “The reluctance to change our ideas in light of new information.”

goal

Four Goals of Social Research Are:1

  1. To Describe

  2. To Explore

  3. To Explain

  4. To Evaluate

Descriptive Research

Research in which social phenomena are defined and described.

Exploratory Research

Seeks to find out how people get along in the setting under question, what meanings they give to their actions, and what issues concern them.

Explanatory (Causal) Research

Seeks to identify causes and effects of social phenomena and to predict how one phenomenon will change or vary in response to variation in another phenomenon.

Evaluation Research

Research that describes or identifies the impact of social policies and programs.

🧠 Your Turn

02:00

👇 What is the goal of this research paper?

Paper 1, https://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/article/33/2/160/1591440

🧠 Your Turn

02:00

👇 What is the goal of this research paper?

Paper 2, https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JIMA-06-2018-0101/full/html

🧠 Your Turn

02:00

👇 What is the goal of this research paper?

Paper 3, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9282866

Research
Approaches

Research Approach1

  • “Research approaches are plans and the procedures for research that span the steps from broad assumptions to detailed methods of data collection, analysis, and interpretation.”

  • “It involves the intersection of philosophical assumptions, designs and specific methods.”

Three Research Approaches are:

  1. Qualitative
  2. Quantitative, and
  3. Mixed methods

Qualitative Approach

  • “using words

  • “for exploring and understanding the meaning individuals or groups ascribe to a social or human problem.”

  • open-ended questions and responses

  • flexible report structure

For example: Domestic abuse/violence

Quantitative Approach

  • use numbers

  • “for testing objective theories by examining relationship among variables”

  • closed-ended questions and responses

  • set structure

For example: Video games and agression

Mixed Methods Approach

  • “an inquiry involving collecting both quantitative and qualitative data, integrating the two forms of data, and using distinct designs that may involve philosophical assumptions and theoretical frameworks.”

For example: Gender and alcohol

🧠 Your Turn

10:00

Which research approach will you use to study the consumer satisfaction level for each product in India? And why?

Study 1 Tide Powder

Study 2 Maggi

Study 3 Royal Enfield Bike

Research
Framework

A Framework for Research

is the 🕸️ interconnection of:

  • Philosophical World-views,

  • Research Designs, &

  • Research Methods

A Framework for Research1

Philosophical World-view:

“A general philosophical orientation about the world and the nature of research that a researcher brings to a study”

Post-positivism:

  • Determination (cause & effect)

  • Reductionism
    (concept \(\rightarrow\) variables \(\rightarrow\) hypothesis)

  • Empirical observation and measurement

  • Theory verification

Constructivist:

  • Understanding

  • Multiple participant meanings

  • Social & historical construction

  • Theory generation

Transformative:

  • During the 1980s & 1990s for marginalized individuals in society

  • Issues of power and social justice, discrimination, and oppression.

  • Includes critical theorists; Marxists; feminists; racial and ethnic minorities; person with disabilities; indigenous and post colonial peoples; and members of LGBTQ.

  • Research contain action and change-oriented

Pragmatic:

  • It arises out of actions, situations, and consequence of actions

  • Problem-centred instead of methods

  • Pluralistic

  • Real-world practice oriented

Research Designs:

“These are types of inquiry within qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches that provide specific direction for procedures in a research study”

Research Designs: “types of inquiry”

Visible during the 1990s and in the 21st century.

  • Narrative research from the humanities … one or more individuals to provide stories about their lives.

  • Phenomenology from philosophy and psychology … description culminates in the essence of the experiences for several individuals who have all experienced the phenomenon.

  • Grounded theory from sociology in which the researcher derives a general, abstract theory of a process, action, or interaction grounded in the view of participants.

  • Ethnography from anthropology and sociology in which the research studies the shared patterns of behaviors, languages, and actions of an intact cultural group in a natural setting.

  • Case study researcher develops an in-depth analysis of a case … collect detailed information using a variety of data collection procedures

During the late 19th century and throughout the 20th century.

  • Experimental Designs seeks to determine if a specific treatment influences an outcome.

  • Survey research provides a quantitative or numeric description of trends, attitudes, or opinions of a population by studying a sample of that population.

Began in late 1980s

  • Convergent mixed methods collects both forms of data at the same time and integrates the information in the results.

  • Explanatory sequential quantitative studies followed by the qualitative study, the qualitative study was conducted to explain further/better the results of quantitative study.

  • Exploratory sequential qualitative study was done first then this study’s results are used to do the quantitative study.

  • Transformative, embedded, or multi-phase

Research Methods

“Involve the forms of data collection, analysis, and interpretation that researchers propose for their studies”

Research Methods:

  • Emerging methods

  • Open-ended questions

  • Interview data, observation data, document data & audio-visual data

  • Text & image analysis

  • Themes, patterns, and interpretation

  • Pre-determined methods

  • Instrument based questions

  • Performance data, attitude data, observational data, & census data

  • Statistical analysis

  • Statistical interpretation

  • Both predetermined & emerging methods

  • Both open- and closed- ended questions

  • Multiple forms of data drawing on all possibilities

  • Statistical & text analysis

  • Across databases interpretation

Approaches = Worldview + Design + Methods

  • Constructivist worldview

  • Ethnographic design

  • Observation of behavior

  • Post-positivist worldview

  • Experimental design

  • Measures of attitudes

  • Pragmatic world-view

  • Collection of both qualitative & quantitative data

🧠 Your Turn

05:00

Take a topic that you would like to study, and using the combinations of worldviews, designs, and research methods, discuss a project that brings together a worldview, designs, and methods. Identify whether this would be quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods research.

ethics



Ethics & Research1

  • “code of conduct or expected societal norms of behaviour while conducting research.”
  • Ethical conduct applies to:
    • the organization,

    • the members that sponsor the research,

    • the researchers who undertake the research, and

    • the respondents who provide them with the necessary data.

Nuremberg War Crime Trials (1946)

Tuskegee Syphilis study (1932-1972)

Ethical Issues in Research1

  1. Prior to conducting the study

  2. Beginning of the study

  3. Collecting data

  4. Analyzing data

  5. Reporting, sharing, and storing data

Prior to conducting the study

  • Examine professional association standards.

  • Seek college/university approval on campus through the board.

  • Gain local permission from site and participants.

  • Select a site without a vested interest in outcome of study.

  • Negotiate authorship for publication.

  • Consult the code of ethics for professional association in your area.

  • Submit proposal for board approval.

  • Identify and go through local approvals; find gatekeepers or key personnel to help.

  • Select sites that will not raise power issues with researchers.

  • Give credit for work done on the project; decide on author order in future publication.

Beginning the Study

  • Identify a research problem that will benefit participants.

  • Disclose purpose of the study.

  • Do not pressure participants into signing consent forms.

  • Respect norms and charters of indigenous societies.

  • Be sensitive to needs of vulnerable populations (eg., children).

  • Conduct a needs assessment or informal conversation with participants about their needs.

  • Contact participants, and inform them of the general purpose of the study.

  • Tell participants that they do not have to sign form.

  • Find out about cultural, religious, gender, and other differences that need to be respected.

  • Obtain appropriate consent (eg., parents, as well as children).

Collecting Data

  • Respect the site, and disrupt as little as possible.

  • Make certain that all participants receive the same treatment.

  • Avoid deceiving participants.

  • Respect potential power imbalances and exploitation of participants (eg., interviewing, observing).

  • Do not “use” participants by gathering data and leaving site.

  • Avoid collecting harmful information.

  • Build trust, and convey extent of anticipated disruption in gaining access.

  • Put into place wait list provisions for treatment for controls.

  • Discuss purpose of the study and how data will be used.

  • Avoid leading questions. Withhold sharing personal impressions. Avoid disclosing sensitive information. Involve participants as collaborators.

  • Provide rewards for participating.

  • Stick to questions stated in an interview protocol.

Analyzing Data

  • Avoid siding with participants (going native).

  • Avoid disclosing only positive results.

  • Respect the privacy and anonymity of participants.

  • Report multiple perspectives.

  • Report contrary findings.

  • Assign fictious names or aliases; develop composite profiles of participants.

Reporting, Sharing, & Storing Data

  • Avoid falsifying authorship, evidence, data, findings, and conclusions.

  • Do not plagiarize.

  • Avoid disclosing information that would harm participants.

  • Communicate in clear, straightforward, appropriate language.

  • Share data with others

  • Keep raw data and other materials (eg., details of procedures, instruments.)

  • Do not duplicate or piecemeal publications.

  • Provide complete proof of compliance with ethical issues and lack of conflict of interest, if requested.

  • State who owns the data from a study.

  • Report honestly.

  • See APA guidelines for permissions needed to reprint or adapt work of others.

  • Use composite stories so that individuals cannot be identified.

  • Use unbiased language appropriate for audiences of the research.

  • Provide copies of report to participants and stakeholders. Share results with other researchers. Consider website distribution. Consider publishing in different languages.

  • Store data and materials for 5 years (as per APA).

  • Refrain from using the same material for more than one publication.

  • Disclose funders for research. Disclose who will profit from the research.

  • Give credit for ownership to researcher, participants, and advisers.

IMPORTANT TERMS1

  • Anonymity: Anonymity is guaranteed in a research project when neither the researchers nor the readers of the findings can link a given response with a given respondent.

  • Confidentiality: A research project guarantees confidentiality when the researcher can identify a given person’s responses but promises not to reveal them publicly.

  • Debriefing: Interviewing subjects to learn about their experience of participation in the project and to inform them of any unrevealed purpose.

  • Informed Consent: A norm in which subjects base their voluntary participation in research projects on a full understanding of the possible risks involved.

writing

Writing Ideas1



“to practice writing rather than simply talk about it”

💭 Writing as Thinking

  • Early in the process of research, write ideas down rather than talk about them.

  • Working through several drafts of a proposal rather than trying to polish the first draft

💭 Writing as Thinking: Zero Draft

💭 Writing as Thinking

  • Do not edit your proposal at the early-draft stage.

    • First develop an outline; it could be a sentence or word outline or a visual map
    • Write out a draft and then shift and sort ideas, moving entire paragraphs in the manuscript.
    • Finally, edit and polish each sentence.

📝 The Habit of Writing

  • Establish the discipline of writing in a regular and continuous way on your proposal.

  • Make writing a daily activity, regardless of mood, regardless of readiness to write.

  • Write while you are fresh.

  • Avoid writing in binges (excessive).

  • Write in small, regular amounts

  • Schedule writing tasks

  • Time spent writing + page finished + tasks completed

  • Share your writing with supportive peers.

🤮 Reabability of the Manuscript/Draft

  • Use consistent terms in your proposal.

  • Readers need road signs to guide them from one major idea to the next.

  • Coherence in writing means that the ideas tie together and logically flow from one sentence to another and from one paragraph to another.

Voice, Tense, and “Fat”

  • Use the active voice as much as possible in scholarly writing.

  • Use strong active verbs.

  • Pay close attention to the tense of past studies:

    • Past simple tense or the present perfect tense for the literature review and procedures based on past events,
    • The past simple tense to describe results,
    • The present tense to discuss the results and to present the conclusions.
  • Edit and revise drafts to trim the fat.

“If I have seen further,
it is by standing on the
shoulders of giants.”
- Newton (1675)

  • Find an argument/angle
  • So what?
  • Advance the conversation

Citation

  • “Citing sources allows scholars to give credit to other scholars for their hard work and their ideas.

  • “By citing sources, scholars provide a roadmap for readers who are interested in learning more about a topic and joining the ongoing conversation about that topic.”

References/Bibliography

References/Bibliography

🚨 Plagiarism1

  • “Purposely misrepresenting the work of other authors – that is, their viewpoints, ideas, models, findings, conclusions, interpretations, and so on.”

  • “Plagiarism – the use of another’s original words, arguments, or ideas as though they were your own, even if this is done in good faith, out of carelessness, or out of ignorance.”

😌 How to Avoid Plagiarism

  • Keep track of your sources; print electronic sources

    • complete URL & date
    • check URL before submission
  • Keep sources in correct context

    • unbiased
  • Don’t cut and paste: File and label your sources

    • separate file with date (2021-12-29-belk.doc)

😌 How to Avoid Plagiarism

  • Keep your own writing and your sources separate

  • Keep your notes and your draft separate

  • Paraphrase carefully in your notes; acknowledge your sources explicitly when paraphrasing

    • separate notes from draft
  • Don’t save your citations for later

  • Always use quotation marks for directly quoted material, even for short phrases and key terms.





Completed Research is the Best Research



🧠 Your Turn

15:00
  1. Describe an object by its parts and dimensions, without first telling the reader its name.

OR

  1. Write a conversation between two people on any dramatic subject.

OR

  1. Write a set of directions for a complicated task.

Research
Proposal

Research Proposal1

  • Most organized research begins with a description of what is planned in the project: what questions it will raise and how it will answer them.

  • Often such proposals are created for the purpose of getting the resources needed to conduct the research envisioned.

Research Proposal1

  • Before any research study is undertaken, there should be an agreement between the person who authorizes the study and the researcher as to:

    • the problem to be investigated,

    • the methodology to be used,

    • the duration of the study, and

    • its cost.

Arguments Presented in a Proposal

  1. What do readers need to better understand your topic?

  2. What do readers need to know about your topic?

  3. What do you propose to study?

  4. What is the setting, and who are the people you will study?

  5. What methods do you plan to use to collect data?

  6. How will you analyze the data?

  7. How will you validate your findings?

  8. What ethical issues will your study present?

  9. What do preliminary results show about the practicability and value of the proposed study?

Format for a Quantitative Proposal

  • Introduction

  • Statement of the problem (issue, existing literature about problem, deficiencies in literature, relevance of study for audiences)

  • Purpose of the study

  • Research questions or hypotheses

  • Theoretical perspective

  • Review of the literature (theory may be included in this section instead of the introduction)

  • Methods

  • Type of research design (e.g., experimental, survey)

  • Population, sample, and participants

  • Data collection instruments, variables, and materials

  • Data analysis procedures

  • Anticipated ethical issues in the study

  • Preliminary studies or pilot tests

  • Appendixes: Instruments, timeline, and proposed budget

Tips: Designing the Sections of a Proposal1

  • Specify the sections early in the design of a proposal. … develop an outline.

  • Study previous proposal for the same organisation or supervisor.

  • Attend program or course on proposal development

  • Sit down with your adviser or supervisor, and go over his or her preferred format for a proposal.

🏆 Hallmarks of Scientific Research1

  • Purposiveness

  • Rigour

  • Testability

  • Replicability

  • Precision and confidence

  • Objectivity

  • Generalizability

  • Parsimony

Hallmarks of Scientific Research

  • Purposiveness: a definite aim or purpose or goal.

  • Rigour: a good theoretical base and a sound methodological design.

  • Testability: hypotheses should be testable.

  • Replicability: similar findings emerge on the basis of data collected by others employing the same methods.

Hallmarks of Scientific Research - Precision and confidence:

  • To design the research in a manner that ensures that our findings are as close to reality as possible.

    • Precision: refers to the closeness of the findings to “reality” based on a sample.
    • Confidence: refers to the probability that our estimations are correct.

Hallmarks of Scientific Research - Objectivity:

  • Conclusions should be based upon the facts of the findings derived from actual data,and not on our own subjective or emotional values.

  • The more objective the interpretation of the data, the more scientific the research investigation becomes.

Hallmarks of Scientific Research - Generalizability:

  • Refers to the scope (wider range) of applicability of the research findings in one organizational setting to other settings.

  • Not many research findings can be generalized to all other settings.

  • A more elaborate sampling design, which would doubtless increase the generalizability of the results.

Hallmarks of Scientific Research - Parsimony:

  • Simplicity in explaining the phenomena or problems that occur.

  • A good understanding of the problem and the important factors that influence it.

🥘cook
book😋

🥘 Let’s cook…

  1. What to cook?

  2. How to cook?

  3. What is the result of your cooking?

  4. How similar or different is your cooked dish?

  5. So what, you cooked this dish (sh!t)?

🥘🤓 Let’s cook… Research

  1. What to cook?

    • Title + Abstract + Introduction + Literature Review
  2. How to cook?

    • Method
  3. What is the result of your cooking?

    • Results
  4. How similar or different is your cooked dish?

    • Discussion
  5. So what, you cooked this dish (sh!t)?

    • Conclusion + References + Appendix

Research Paper Hourglass Structure

🥘 Research Report Structure

  1. Title (as per APA < 12 words)
  2. Abstract (150-250 words)
  3. Introduction
  4. Method (Participants + Procedure)
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. References
  8. Appendix

INTRODUCTION

🍽️ A Good Introduction Addresses1:

  1. Establishing the problem leading to the study,

  2. Reviewing the literature about the problem,

  3. Identifying deficiencies in the literature about the problem,

  4. Targeting an audience and noting the significance of the problem for this audience, and

  5. Identifying the purpose of the proposed study.

The Research Problem

Identification of the Broad Problem
\(\downarrow\)
Preliminary Research
\(\downarrow\)
Definition of the Research Problem

The Research Topic1

  • “The topic is the subject or subject matter of a proposed study”

  • “casteism”, “organizational creativity”, “psychological stress”, “consumer buying behavior”, “exam anxiety”, “leadership”, “service quality”

  • “The topic becomes the central idea to learn about or to explore”

  • “Topic grounds us and provides a sign of what we are studying.”

How to write a working Title?

Tip

“My study is about ………………………………..”

“Good” Research Question1

  • Feasibility given the time and resources available

  • Social importance, and

  • Scientific relevance

Good Topic or Question

  • Adds to the pool of research knowledge in the literature available on the topic, …

  • Replicate past studies, …

  • Lifts up the voices of under-represented groups or individuals, …

  • Helps to address social justice, or …

  • Transforms the ideas and beliefs of the researcher.”

🔍👀 A new perspective or “angle” to the existing literature:

  • Studying an unusual location (e.g., rural India).

  • Examining an unusual group of participants (e.g., refugees).

  • Taking a perspective that may not be expected and reverses the expectation (e.g., why marriages do work rather than do not work).

🔍👀 A new perspective or “angle” to the existing literature:

  • Providing novel means of collecting data (e.g., collect sounds).

  • Presenting results in unusual ways.

  • Studying a timely topic (e.g., immigration issues)

Studies Addressing the Problem

  • Reviewing studies that have examined the issue.

  • Summarize large groups of studies instead of individual ones.

  • Justify the importance of the study

  • To create distinction between past studies and the proposed one.

Deficiencies in Past Literature

  • Topics have not been explored with a particular group, sample, or population;

  • The literature may need to be replicated or repeated;

  • The voices of underrepresented groups left

  • “Future research” to look for gaps.

Significance of a Study for Audiences

  • 3 or 4 reasons that the study adds to scholarly research and literature in the field.

  • 3 or 4 reasons about how the study helps improve practice.

  • 3 or 4 reasons as to why the study will improve policy or decision making.

lit review

How does this project contribute to the literature?

“Research is to see what everybody else has seen, and to think what nobody else has thought.”

– Albert Szent-Gyorgyi

📚 Why Literature Review?

  • “literature review helps to determine whether the topic is worth studying, and it provides insight into ways in which the researcher can limit the scope to a needed area of inquiry.”

  • “to consider whether the research topic can and should be researched”

📚 Purpose of Literature Review:

  • It shares with the reader the results of other studies that are closely related to the one being undertaken.

  • It relates a study to the larger, ongoing dialogue in the literature, filling in gaps and extending prior studies

  • It provides a framework for establishing the importance of the study as well as a benchmark for comparing the results with other findings.

📚 LR Sources

  • Textbooks

  • Journals

  • Theses

  • Conference proceedings

  • Unpublished manuscripts

  • Reports

  • Newspapers

  • The Internet

😭 Literature Review Process

😭 Literature Review Process1

  1. Begin by identifying key words.

  2. Searching the databases like Google Scholar, Web of Science, EBSCO, ProQuest, and JSTOR or you can also use website like Library Genesis to download books and papers.

  3. Locate about 50 reports of research in articles or books related to research on your topic.

  4. Skim this initial group of articles or chapters, and collect those that are central to your topic.

😭 Literature Review Process…

  1. Designing a literature map … a visual picture of groupings of the literature on the topic that illustrates how your particular study will add to the existing literature and position your study within the larger body of research.

  2. Begin to draft summaries of the most relevant articles. Include precise references to the literature using an appropriate style guide like APA.

😭 Literature Review Process

  1. After summarizing the literature,
  • assemble the literature review, structuring it thematically or organizing it by important concepts.

  • This summary should also point toward the methods

  • It is at this point as well that you could advance a critique of the past literature and point our deficiencies in it and issues in its methods.

🛠️ Literature Review Tools

Connected Papers

Connected Papers

  • “A visual tool to help researchers and practitioners find and explore academic papers.”1

  • “Connected Papers uses a single, user-chosen ‘origin paper’ to build a map of related research, based partly on overlapping citations. The service recently surpassed one million users”2

  • Website: https://www.connectedpapers.com/

Open Knowledge Maps

Open Knowledge Maps

  • “We are a charitable non-profit organization and we believe that a better way to explore and discover scientific knowledge will benefit us all.”

  • “Our Goal is to revolutionize discovery of scientific knowledge. We are building a visual interface that dramatically increases the visibility of research findings for science and society alike.”

  • Website: https://openknowledgemaps.org/index

Scholarcy

Scholarcy

  • “The AI-powered article summarizer”

  • “reads your research articles, reports and book chapters in seconds and breaks them down into bite-sized sections”

  • Website: https://www.scholarcy.com/

Speechify

  • “Reading is hard. Listening is easy. Listen to the things you normally read with the #1 text-to-speech AI reader.”

  • Website: https://speechify.com/

scite_

  • “1.1b citation statements extracted and analyzed from over 32m full-text articles”

  • “helps you see whether publications, research results, and claims have been supported, contrasted, or mentioned by other researchers.”

  • Website: https://www.scite.ai/

theory

Theory

  • explains a certain phenomenon, …

  • and the idea is that this explanation will hold in a wide range of settings.”1

Theory

“theory is any concept, instrument, model, or framework that helps them to think about or solve a problem, to describe a phenomenon, or to better understand a topic of interest”

Expectancy Theory of Motivation

By Victor Vroom (in 1964):

“people will choose how to behave depending on the outcome they expect as a result of their behavior.”

Expectancy Theory:1

  • “people decide what to do based on what they expect the outcome to be”

  • “individuals are motivated to perform if they know that their extra performance is recognized and rewarded”

Classical Conditioning

by Ivan Pavlov

The Role of Theory

  • Some research is aimed at building theory

  • other to test a theory …

  • to describe what is going on, using an existing framework, instrument, or model.

The Use of Theory1 in Quan Research:

  • Researchers often test hypotheses stemming from theories.

  • Broader theory guiding to the study hypotheses.

The Use of Theory in Qual Research

  • It may generate a theory as the final outcome of a study and place it at the end of a project

  • Sometimes it comes at the beginning and provides a lens that shapes what is looked at and the questions asked

The Use of Theory in Mixed Methods

  • Researchers may both test theories and generate them

  • Contain a theoretical framework within which both quantitative and qualitative data are collected

Quantitative Theory Use

  • Causality: means we would expect variable \(X\) to cause variable \(Y\).

  • Does drinking one glass of red wine daily (\(X\)) cause you have a reduced risk for a heart attack (\(Y\))?

  • Do number of playing hours (\(a\)) and attendance (\(b\)) influence the marks in the exam (\(z\))?

Causality

\[Red\;Wine \longrightarrow Heart\;attack\] \[X \longrightarrow Y\]

Variables in Quantitative Research

  • Variable: “refers to a characteristic or attribute of an individual or an organization that can be measured or observed and that varies among the people or organization being studied.”

  • Gender, age, socio-economic status; attitudes or behaviors such as racism, social control, political power, leadership etc..

Variables in Quantitative Research

  • Independent variables:

    • Those that influence, or affect outcomes in experimental studies.

    • They are manipulated in an experiment and thus independent of all other influences.

Variables in Quantitative Research

  • Dependent variables:

    • Those that depend on the independent variables,

    • They are the outcomes or results of the influence of the independent variables

Variables in Quantitative Research

  • Independent variable/Predictor variable

  • Dependent variable / Outcome variable

  • Confounding variable

  • Mediating variable

  • Moderating variable

Hypothesis (plural is hypotheses)1

  • “a tentative, yet testable, statement, which predicts what you expect to find in your empirical data.”

  • “logically conjectured relationships between two or more variables expressed in the form of testable statements”

Hypothesis Development: If-then statements

  • Young women will more likely to express dissatisfaction with their body weight, when they are more frequently exposed to images of thin models in advertisements.

  • If young women are more frequently exposed to images of thin models in advertisements, then they will be more likely to express dissatisfaction with their body weight.

Directional Hypothesis Development:

“the direction of the relationship between the variables (positive/negative) is indicated”

  • The greater the stress experienced in the job, the lower the job satisfaction of employees.

  • Women are more motivated than men.

Non-directional Hypothesis Development:

“postulate a relationship or difference, but offer no indication of the direction of these relationships or differences”

  • There is a relation between arousal-seeking tendency and consumer preferences for complex product designs.

  • There is a difference between the work ethic values of American and Asian employees.

Theory in Quantitative Research

“A set of interrelated constructs (variables), definitions, and prepositions that presents a systematic view of phenomena by specifying relations among variables, with the purpose of explaining natural phenomena” (adapted from Kerlinger 1979)

Theory in Quantitative Research

  • “Theory helps to explain (predict) phenomena that occur in the world”

  • “Theories develop when researchers test a prediction over and over.”

Theory in Quantitative Research

Developing a Theory

  1. Investigators combine independent, mediating, and dependent variables into questions.

  2. These questions provide information about the type of relationship (positive, negative, or unknown) and its magnitude (high or low).

  3. Forming this information into a predictive statement (hypothesis)

  4. When researcher test hypotheses over and over in different settings and with different populations, a theory emerges, and someone gives it a name.

  5. Theory develops as an explanation to advance knowledge in particular fields.

Levels of Theory

  • Micro-level Theories: provide explanations limited to small slices of time, space, or number of people; such as Goffman’s theory of face work.

  • Meso-level Theories: link micro and macro levels; like theories of organizations, social movement, or communities; such as Collin’s theory of control in organizations.

  • Macro-level Theories: explain larger aggregates, such as social institutions, cultural systems, and whole societies; such as theory of social stratification.

Writing Quant Theoretical Perspective

Tip

“The theory that I will use is ………….. (name the theory). It was developed by …………….. (identify the origin, source, or developer of the theory), and it was used to study ………….. (identify the topics where one finds the theory being applied). This theory indicates that …………….. (identify the propositions or hypotheses in the theory). As applied to my study, this theory hold that I would expect my independent variable(s) ………….. (state independent variables) to influence or explain the dependent variable(s) ……………. (state dependent variables) because ………….. (provide a rationale based on the logic of the theory).”

KEY TERMS

  • Variables
  • Causality
  • Theory

METHODS

Methods1

  • Quantitative Methods

    • Survey designs
    • Experimental design
  • “both approaches share a common goal of helping the researcher make inferences about relationships among variables, and how the sample results may generalize to a broader population of interest”

Methods

  • Qualitative Methods

Quantitative Methods

  • “these designs reflect post-positivist philosophical assumptions”

  • “examining the relationships between and among variables is central”

Survey Design

  • “provides a quantitative description of trends, attitudes, and opinions of population, or…

  • tests for associations among variables of a population,…

  • by studying a sample of that population.”

Survey Design Helps

  • Descriptive Questions
    • What percentage of students experience ragging in the higher education?
  • Questions about the relationships between variables
    • Is there a positive association between the number of study hours and the marks obtained?
  • Questions about predictive relationships between variables over time
    • Does number of study hours can predict the exam anxiety of the students?

A Checklist of Questions for Designing a Survey Study Plan

Is the purpose of a survey design stated?

What type of design will be used and what are the reasons for choosing the design mentioned?

Is the nature of the survey (cross-sectional vs. longitudinal) identified?

Is the population and its size mentioned?

Will the population be stratified? If so, how?

How many people will be in the sample? On what basis was the size chosen?

What will be the procedure for sampling these individuals (e.g., random, nonrandom)?

What instrument will be used in the survey? For each instrument, who developed it, how many items does it contain, does it have acceptable reliability and validty, and what are the scale anchors?

What procedure will be used to pilot or field-test the survey?

What is the timeline for administering the survey?

What is the timeline for administering the survey?

How will the measures be scored and converted into variables?

How will the variables be used to test your research questions?

What specific steps will be taken in data analysis to do the following:

  • Analyze returns?

  • Check for responses bias?

  • Conduct a descriptive analysis?

  • Combine items into scales?

  • Check for reliability of scales?

  • Run inferential statistics to answer the research questions or assess practical implications of the results?

How will the results be interpreted?

Source: Creswell and Creswell (2018)

The Survey Design

  • Identify the purpose of survey research: questions about variables of interest to you.

  • Specify the form of data collection,

    • Like mail, telephone, the internet, personal interviews, or group administration

    • Provide rationale for the procedure, strengths and weaknesses, costs, data availability, and convenience.

The Survey Design

  • Indicate why a survey methods is the preferred type of approach for this study.

  • Indicate whether the survey will be

    • Cross-sectional - the data collected at one point in time.

    • Longitudinal - with the data collected over time.

The Population & Sample

The Population & Sample

The Population

“refers to the entire group of people, events, or things of interest that the researcher wishes to investigate.”

Element

“An element in a single member of the population”

Sample

“a subset of the population. It comprises some members selected from it, some, but not all, elements of the population form the sample”

Sample

“by studying the sample, the researcher should be able to draw conclusions that are generalizable to the population of interest.”

Subject

“A subject is a single member of the sample, just as an element is a single member of the population”

Sampling Unit

“The sampling unit is the element or set of elements that is available for selection in some stage of the sampling process.”

Sampling

“The process of selecting the right individuals, objects, or events as representatives for the entire population”

The Sampling Process

  1. Define the population.

  2. Determine the sample frame.

  3. Determine the sampling design.

  4. Determine the appropriate sample size.

  5. Execute the sampling process.

The Sampling Process…

  1. Define the population … in terms of elements, geographical boundaries, and time.

  2. Determine the sample frame … a representation of all the elements in the population from which the sample is drawn … it may not be always be a current, up-to-date document

  3. Determine the sampling design.

    • Non-Probability sampling
    • Probability sampling

The Sampling Process

  1. Determining the sample size.
  • Indicate the number of people in the sample and the procedures to compute this number.

  • Sample trade off: larger sample more accuracy in the inferences but more sample more time and cost.

Non-Probability Sampling

  • “Any technique in which samples are selected in some way not suggested by probability theory

    • Relying on available subjects, such as stopping people at a street corner or some other location

    • “risky” sampling method for social research

    • No control over the representativeness of a sample

Purposive or Judgemental Sampling

(Non-Probability Sampling)

Purposive or Judgemental Sampling

(Non-Probability Sampling)

  • “the units to be observed are selected on the basis of the researcher’s judgement about which ones will be the most useful or representative”

  • “situation being studied becomes clearer and certain types of subjects seem more central to understanding than others”

Snowball Sampling

(Non-Probability Sampling)

Snowball Sampling

(Non-Probability Sampling)

  • “each person interviewed may be asked to suggest additional people for interviewing”

  • “appropriate when the members of a special population are difficult to locate”

  • “often employed in field research”

Quota Sampling

(Non-Probability Sampling)

Quota Sampling

(Non-Probability Sampling)

  • “units are selected for a sample on the basis of pre-specified characteristics, so that the total sample will have the same distribution of characteristics assumed to exist in the population being studied.”

Probability Sampling

  • “When researchers want precise, statistical descriptions of large populations”

  • “The general term for samples selected in accordance with probability theory, typically involving some random-selection mechanism”

Representativeness

Representativeness1

  • “that quality of a sample of having the same distribution of characteristics as the population from which it was selected”

  • “By implication, description and explanation derived from an analysis of the sample may be assumed to represent similar ones in the population.”

  • “Representativeness is enhanced by probability sampling and provides for generalizability and the use of inferential statistics”

Probability Sampling Methods:

  • Simple Random Sampling (SRS)

  • Systematic Random Sampling,

  • Cluster Sampling, and

  • Stratified Random Sampling

Simple Random Sampling (SRS)

(Probability Sampling Methods)

“A type of probability sampling in which the units composing a population are assigned numbers. A set of random numbers is generated, and the units having those numbers are included in the sample”

Simple Random Sampling (SRS)

(Probability Sampling Methods)

Systematic Random Sampling

(Probability Sampling Methods)

“A type of probability sampling in which every \(k\)th unit in list is selected in the sample”

Cluster Sampling

(Probability Sampling Methods)

“A multistage sampling in which natural groups (clusters) are sampled initially, with the members of each selected group being subsampled afterward.”

Cluster Sampling

(Probability Sampling Methods)

“A multistage sampling in which natural groups (clusters) are sampled initially, with the members of each selected group being subsampled afterward.”

Stratified Random Sampling

(Probability Sampling Methods)

Stratification: “The grouping of the units composing a population into homogeneous groups before sampling”

Stratified Random Sampling

(Probability Sampling Methods)

Stratification: “The grouping of the units composing a population into homogeneous groups before sampling”

Non Probability Sampling

  • Purposive Sampling
  • Snowball Sampling
  • Quota Sampling

Probability Sampling

  • Simple Random Sampling
  • Systematic Random Sampling
  • Cluster Sampling
  • Stratified Sampling

Instrumentation

  • Name the survey instruments used to collect data.

  • Validity of scores using the instrument.

    • Content validity
    • Predictive or concurrent validity
    • Construct validity
  • Reliability of scores on the instrument.

    • Consistency or repeat-ability of instrument
  • Sample items.

  • Content of instrument.

  • Pilot testing.

  • Administering the survey.

Experiment Design

“systematically manipulates one or more variables in order to evaluate how this manipulation impacts an outcome (or outcomes) of interest”

DATA
ANALYSIS

FINDINGS

CONCLUSION

Image Sources

References

Babbie, Earl R. 2020. The Practice of Social Research. Cengage Learning.
Chambliss, Daniel F., and Russell K. Schutt. 2018. Making Sense of the Social World: Methods of Investigation. SAGE Publications.
Clough, Peter, and Cathy Nutbrown. 2012. A Student’s Guide to Methodology. 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Creswell, John W., and J. David Creswell. 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage publications.
Sekaran, Uma, and Roger Bougie. 2016. Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons.